Thinking along Individualism and Collectivism: An Inquiry into the Attitudes towards Teaching Profession of Prospective Teachers
Author(s):
Derya Kilicoglu (presenting / submitting) Ilknur Senturk (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

01 SES 06 A, Perspectives on Professional Values

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-24
15:30-17:00
Room:
OB-Theatre F
Chair:
Deniz Hunuk

Contribution

Culture plays a significant role on how a person experiences the world around himself (Desai, 2007; Triandis, 1993), thus it has an influence on attitudes and behaviors. Since culture refers to the set of ideas, beliefs, assumptions and norms that are shared by a group of people, it serves to guide people’s behavior (Goodenough, 1973). In fact, cultural norms have effect on perceptions and related behavioral outcomes. Such as in education, it is believed that that teachers want to acknowledge cultural tendencies of the students since high degrees of human interaction can be influenced by cultural elements (Furrer, Liu & Sudharshan, 2000). Both students and the teachers come to the school with various expectations and these expectations depend on cultural models or schemas that affect the way they look the world (D’Andrade, 1992). One significant dimension of culture depends on individualism and collectivism that is exhibited (Desai, 2007). Indeed, the content of individualism includes degree to which an individual is most concerned with self interests (Hofstede, 1984). Individualism is characterized by self-reliance, personal achievement, competition, pleasure and independence with an emphasis on what makes the individual distinct (Cho, Kwon, Gentry, Jun & Kropp, 1994; Triandis, 1990). Thus, individualist people’s behavior is mostly determined by personal goals. In contrast, collectivism value family integrity, group cooperation, sociability and interdependence (Schwartz, 1994). Collectivists promote unity and selflessness with work group goals above individual needs or desires. Hence, collectivists put emphasis on tradition, reciprocation of favors and sense of belonging while devaluing personal interests for the good of in-groups since relationships are important. Since being polythetic constructs, individualism and collectivism is described in four dimensions: horizontal individualism, vertical individualism, horizontal collectivism and vertical collectivism (Triandis & Gelfand, 1998). Horizontal individualists are characterized as independent and confident in their personal abilities, value their freedom, desire to be unique and respect other people’s opinions due to their strong belief in equality (Triandis, 1995). Likewise, vertical individualists treasure for their independence and individuality beside to advocating competition and seeking for social status (Yao, Wang, Dang & Wang, 2012). Within each cultural dimension, people exhibit unique cognitions, norms, self concepts, emotions and values (Powers, 2013). Since culture is transmitted to one generation to the next, the values and expectations of education are transmitted and reconstructed by student and teacher interactions in school settings (Frankel, Swanson & Sagan, 2005). Students coming from different cultural environments may have different norms and values; therefore, they may have different attitudes and tendencies towards any social object as regards cognitive, affective and behavioral aspects (Bilgin, 1995). Likewise, prospective teachers as students may show different thoughts, beliefs, behaviors and attitudes towards their profession due to the fact that prospective teachers as students have different norms and values with different cultural dimensions. However, how cultural dimension of individualism and collectivism is related to prospective teachers’ attitudes towards teaching profession is unclear and limited studies have been conducted. Given the previous discussion, this study aims to examine individualism and collectivism values of prospective teachers and their attitudes towards teaching profession. In this context, this study sought to determine whether prospective teachers’ cultural background is related to their attitudes towards teaching profession.

Method

The study was conducted as a correlational design to determine the relationship between individualist and collectivist values of prospective teachers and their attitudes towards teaching profession. The population of research comprised prospective teachers studying at the faculty of education at a university in Central Anatolia, Turkey. The overall sample of the study was provided by 360 prospective teachers from five different departments (162 of them from guidance and psychological counseling, 105 of them from special education, 42 of them from computer education, 18 of them from science education, 33 of them from classroom teaching). Respondents ranged in age from 18 to 38 years (X̅=20.35, SD=2.01). Majority of the sample (%58.3) was female while others were male (%41.7). As a data collection instrument, Individualism and Collectivism Scale (INDCOL) developed by Triandis and Gelfand (1998) was used for investigating prospective teachers’ individualistic and collectivist values. INDCOL was utilized to measure four cultural dimensions; vertical individualism, horizontal individualism, vertical collectivism, horizontal collectivism. INDCOL is composed of 16 items, each of the dimensions includes four items. INDCOL was adapted into Turkish Language by Wasti and Erdil (2007). In this study, confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency coefficient was utilized to examine construct validity and reliability. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, goodness of fit indices (χ2=306.00, df=94, χ2/df=3.26, RMSEA=.079, AGFI=.86, GFI=.90, SRMR=.079) showed that INDCOL has acceptable goodness of fit statistics (Hu & Bentler, 1998; Jöreskog & Sörbom, 2001). Internal consistency coefficients for the dimensions of INDCOL were ranged from values .57 to .69. Moreover, Attitudes towards Teaching Profession Scale developed by Erkus, Sanlı, Baglı and Guven (2000) was used to investigate prospective teachers’ attitudes towards teaching. The scale involves one dimension with 23 items. In this study, confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency coefficient was utilized to determine the construct validity and reliability. Goodness of fit indices revealed that the scale has unacceptable values (χ2=3163.11, df=230, χ2/df=13.75, RMSEA=.188, AGFI=.48, GFI=.57, SRMR=.10). This result indicated that the scale does not provide one factor solution. However, internal consistency coefficient was computed as very high as a result of reliability analysis (α= .95). Therefore, exploratory factor analysis was utilized to uncover underlying structure of the scale. Analysis results suggested two-factor solution renamed as conditional and emotional attitudes towards teaching profession that both of the factors had eigenvalues greater than 1.0 and accounted for 61.29% of the total variance.

Expected Outcomes

In order to determine individualism and collectivism values of prospective teachers and their attitudes towards teaching profession, descriptive statistics were utilized. The results indicated that prospective teachers show vertical collectivism (X̅=4.33, SD=.60), horizontal individualism (X̅=4.04, SD=.62) and horizontal collectivism (X̅=4.04, SD=.56) higher than vertical individualism (X̅=3.11, SD=.86). In addition, their attitudes towards teaching profession are computed as almost high (X̅1=4.26, SD1=.79; X̅2=3.61, SD2=.77). To scrutinize whether prospective teachers’ cultural background is related to their attitudes towards teaching profession, correlation analysis was used. The results of the analysis revealed that individualism and collectivism values of prospective teachers significantly correlate with their attitudes towards teaching profession. For the first sub-dimension (conditional attitudes towards teaching profession), horizontal individualism (r=.13), horizontal collectivism (r=.31) and vertical collectivism (r=.36) values are associated with prospective teachers’ attitudes towards teaching profession in a positive way. For the other sub-dimension (emotional attitudes towards teaching profession), prospective teachers’ horizontal collectivism (r=.33) and vertical collectivism (r=.31) values are positively related with their attitudes towards teaching profession while their vertical individualism values (r=-.12) are negatively correlated with their attitudes towards teaching profession. To investigate whether prospective teachers’ individualistic and collectivistic values are the predictors of their attitudes towards teaching profession, multiple linear regression was utilized as a data analysis method. The results showed that prospective teachers’ vertical and horizontal collectivism values significantly predict their conditional and emotional attitudes towards teaching profession in a positive way. Specifically, %14 change in conditional attitudes is accounted for their vertical and horizontal collectivism values (R=.368, R2=.135, F=12.252, p<.01) while %15 change in emotional attitudes is explained by their vertical and horizontal collectivism values (R=.385, R2=.148, F=13.930, p<.01).

References

Bilgin, N. (1995). Sosyal psikolojide yöntem ve pratik çalışmalar. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık. Cho, B., Kwon, U., Gentry, J. W., Jun, S., & Kropp, F. (1999). Cultural values reflected in theme and execution: A comparative study of U.S. and Korean television commercials. Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 59-73. D'Andrade, R. G. (1992). Schemas and motivation. In R. D'Andrade (Ed.) Human motives and cultural models (pp. 23-44). New York: Cambridge University Press. Desai, J. (2007). Intergenerational conflict within Asian American families: The role of acculturation, ethnic identity, individualism, and collectivism. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67, 7369. Erkus, A., Sanlı, N., Baglı, M. T., & Güven, K. (2000). Ögretmenlige iliksin tutum ölçegi gelistirilmesi. Egitim ve Bilim, 116, 27-33. Frankel, R., Swanson, S. R., & Sagan, M. (2005). The role of individualism/collectivism in critical classroom encounters: A four country study. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 17(1/2), 33-59. Furrer, O., Liu, B. S., & Sudharshan, D. (2000). The relationships between culture and service quality perceptions. Journal of Service Research, 2, 355-371. Goodenough, W. (1973). Culture, language, and society. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Hofstede, G. (1984). The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 389-398. Hu, I., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.51. Mooresvile: Scientific Software. Powers, S. B. (2013). Implications of individualism and collectivism on the individual’s social identity. CMC Senior Theses. Paper 658. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45. Triandis, H. C. & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-28. Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol.37). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Triandis, H. C. (1993). Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes. Cross-Cultural Research: The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 27, 155-180. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Wasti, A. & Erdil, S.E. (2007). Bireyci ve toplulukçuluk değerlerinin ölçülmesi: Benlik kurgusu ve INDCOL ölçeklerinin Türkçe geçerlemesi. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 39-66. Yao, X., Wang, S., Dang, J., & Wang, L. (2012). The role of individualism-collectivism in the individual creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 296-303.

Author Information

Derya Kilicoglu (presenting / submitting)
Eskisehir Osmangazi University
Educational Sciences
Eskisehir
Ilknur Senturk (presenting)
Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Turkey

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.