Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Teacher of Gifted Students in Applying Science Activity
Author(s):
Burak Çaylak (presenting / submitting) Jale Çakıroğlu
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES C 15, Pre-Service Teachers and Education

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-07
11:00-12:30
Room:
395. [Main]
Chair:
Jani Petri Ursin

Contribution

Since successful and effective teachers help students enhance their science learning, researchers have tried to develop teachers' teaching abilities (Abell, 2007; Magnusson, Krajcik, & Borko, 1999; Shulman, 1986). Teachers need to know subject matter knowledge related to their field and some other knowledge including knowledge of instructional principles, classroom management, learner and learning, and educational goals. In the classroom environment, all these knowledge interact to each other and they create together teachers’ teaching skill which is called pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) (Abell, 2007). Shulman (1986) developed PCK as a model being used as a theoretical framework to investigate teacher knowledge. Magnusson et al. (1999) modified this model and they explained that PCK have five components which provide a more extensive view of PCK.

PCK has been studied since 1986 but there are many unanswered questions about science teachers’ PCK and its components (Abell, 2008). A similar situation is also true for gifted students’ teachers. Education for gifted students is more ignored field of special education. Gifted and talented people have some abilities and demonstrate high performance in single or more than a few areas such as general intellectual ability, specific academic ability, creative or productive thinking, leadership ability, visual and performing arts, and psychomotor ability (Marland Report, 1971). Although successful teachers have some characteristics and competencies, teachers of gifted students must have special expertise that provides students with comprehensive and effective professional development opportunities (Croft, 2003). Research on gifted students indicated that the teachers don’t have enough knowledge to meet the needs of gifted students (Park & Oliver, 2009). In addition, to our knowledge there is no any study focusing on topic-specific nature of PCK of teachers of gifted students. Thus, teachers of gifted students need to be more topic-specific educational research rather than general knowledge about gifted students and activities (Park & Oliver, 2009).

The purpose of this study was to examine PCK of teacher of gifted students. The present study aimed to investigate the following research question: what is the nature of PCK of science teacher of gifted students in using science activities? In order to achieve the purpose, this study was conducted with the teacher of gifted students and Magnusson et al.’s (1999) PCK model and components; teacher orientation to science teaching (OST), knowledge of curriculum (KoC), knowledge of learners (KoL), knowledge of instructional strategies (KoIS), and knowledge of assessment (KoA) were adopted in this study. 

Method

The case study methodology was used in this study to provide deep and detailed information from the participant. The case of this study involves one teacher and four science activities. Purposive sampling method was used to select the teacher. She graduated from elementary science teacher program and she had 5 years of experience as an elementary science teacher with non-gifted students and another 5 years of experience with gifted students. She is also doctoral students in the program of elementary science teacher. She is an elementary science teacher in the Science and Art Center (SAC) which is a special school for 7-18 ages (elementary and secondary level) of gifted students. The aim of SAC is to provide gifted students with education which help to use the highest level of students' abilities. The gifted students continue their formal education in schools to be registered together with their peers (non-gifted students). At times other than formal training, gifted students can participate in SACs a few days in a week to realize and enhance their individual abilities. In this study, the teacher had six gifted students (elementary age 11 or 12) in each activity and she organized and implemented four science activities as follows; 1. From pencil to bleach includes topics of the electric circuit, current, electric conductivity in liquid medium. 2. Parachute includes topics of force, buoyancy and surface relationship. 3. Hot air balloon includes topics of density and buoyancy. 4. Who inflate the balloon includes topics of structure of matter, physical and chemical changes, and chemical reaction. In order to obtain detailed and comprehensive information about the teacher's PCK, multiple data sources were used through the use of cart-sorting activity, content presentation (CoRe) (Loughran, Berry, & Mulhall, 2006), semi-structured interviews, observation (each activity consisted of three class hours), and field notes. The data were coded by two researchers in deductively (PCK model of Magnusson et al., 1999) and inductively way and the codes were grouped under the broader categories and themes. Triangulation of data and peer review were used to increase the credibility and trustworthiness.

Expected Outcomes

Results of this study were presented based on Magnusson et al.'s (1999) PCK model components. OST: The teacher had an activity-driven OST in nature which is course-specific and supports PCK model. She also supported students by using demonstration, analogy, and video for them to be active in hands-on experiences. Thus, she tried to plan student-centered activities on all occasions and she refused to apply didactic OST in nature. KoC: The teacher had rich KoC from elementary level to secondary level. She has an ability or knowledge differ from PCK model. In fact, there was no curriculum for gifted students in the SAC, so she planned all activities based on her knowledge and experience. The four activities include the content (upper grade level concepts) and resources beyond the current curriculum (non-gifted student), which form enriched curriculum (Davis & Rimm, 2004). KoL: The teacher had rich KoL including knowledge of students' difficulties, misconceptions, pre-requisite. In addition to PCK model, knowledge of the characteristics of the gifted students (quick and fast learning, problem solving and reasoning ability, etc) guided the teacher and shaped the science activities. (KoIS): The teacher presented student-centered instruction to enhance students' ability and knowledge. There were no subject-specific strategies (e.g., inquiry or conceptual change). However, she generally used more topic specific strategies (e.g., models, analogies, and lab experiment) to provide meaningful learning. (KoA): The teacher generally evaluated the conceptual understanding of related topics. She focused on determining the student's misconception by using informal assessment techniques (questioning, observation, or laboratory worksheet). Finally, because of characteristics of the gifted students, individual learning is coming to the forefront. To meet these needs, the teacher has to organize enriched curriculum (Renzulli, 1999). Thus knowledge of enriched curriculum has been developed during her experience and it acted as a different PCK’s component from others.

References

Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105-1149). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1405-1416. Croft, L. J. (2003). Teachers of the gifted: Gifted teachers. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 558-571). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. Davis, G. A. & Rimm, S.B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.), Allyn and Bacon, MA, USA. Loughran, J. J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht: Sense Publishers. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds), examining pedagogical content knowledge: the construct and its implications for science education (pp.95-132). Boston: Kluwer. Marland, S. P. (1971). Education of gifted and talented (1 Vols.), Washington D.C: US Government Printing office. Park, S. & Oliver, J. S. (2009). The translation of teachers’ understanding of gifted students into instructional strategies for teaching science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 333–351. Renzulli, J.S. (1999). What is thing called giftedness, and how do we develop it? A twenty-five year perspective. Journal for the Education of Gifted, 23 (1), 3-54. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.

Author Information

Burak Çaylak (presenting / submitting)
Middle East Technical University
Elementary education
Ankara
Middle East Technical University, Turkey

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.