Breidenbach, D., Dubinsky, E., Hawks, J. & Nichols, D. 1992. Development of the process conception of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics 23 (3), 247–285.
Carlson, M.P. 1998. A cross-sectional investigation of the development of the function concept. Teoksessa A. H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput & E. Dubinsky (toim.) CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education 7. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III: Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences, 114-162.
Cooney, T.J. & Wilson, M.R. 1993. Teachers’ thinking about function: Historical and research perspectives. Teoksessa T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema & T. Carpenter (toim.) Integrating Research about the Graphical Representations of Function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 131–158.
DeMarois, P. & Tall, D. 1996. Facets and layers of the function concept. Teoksessa L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (toim.) Proceedings of the Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, PME 20, Valencia, Spain. Vol. 2, 297–304.
DeMarois, P. & Tall, D. 1999. Function: Organizing principle or cognitive root? Teoksessa O. Zaslavsky (toim.), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Haifa Israel. Vol. 2, 257-264.
Even, R. 1993. Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: prospective secondary teachers and the function concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24 (2), 94-116.
Grevholm, B. 2008. Concept maps as a research tool in mathematics education. Konferenssiesitelmä konferenssissa: Concept Mapping: Connecting Educators. Proc. of the Third Int. Conference on Concept Mapping, Tallinn, Estonia & Helsinki, Finland 2008. (Luettu.
Hitt, F. 1998. Difficulties in the articulation of different representations linked to the concept of function. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 17 (1), 123-134.
Häggström, J. 2005. Begreppet funktion i historisk belysning. Normat, 53 (2), 82-92.
Jones, M. 2006. Demystifying functions: The historical and pedagogical difficulties of the concept of the function. Undergraduate Math Journal, 7 (2), 1-20.
Kenehan, G. 2007. Examining function understanding from contexts using concept maps. Teoksessa T. Lamberg & L. R. Wiest (toim.) Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Stateline, Lake Tahoe: University of Nevada, Reno, 93-99.
Kleiner, I. 1989. Evolution of the function concept: A brief survey. The College Mathematics Journal, 20 (4), 282-300.
Kleiner, I. 1993. Functions: Historical and pedagogical aspects. Science & Education, 2 (2), 183-209.
Leinhardt, G., Zavlasky, O. & Stein, M. 1990. Functions, graphs, and graphing: tasks: learning and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60 (1), 1-64.
Lloyd, G.M. & Wilson, M.S. 1998. Supporting innovation: The impact of a teacher's conceptions of functions on his implementation of a reform curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29 (3), 248-274.
Luzin, N. 1998a. The evolution of... function: Part 1. The American Mathematical Monthly, 105 (1), 59-67.
Luzin, N. 1998b. The evolution of... function: Part 2. The American Mathematical Monthly, 105 (3), 263-270.
Meel, D.E. 1999. Prospective teachers' understandings: Function and composite function. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 1 (Oct.), 1-12.
Mesa, V. 2004. Characterizing practices associated with functions in middle school textbooks: An empirical approach. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56 (2), 255-286.
Monk, S. 1992. Students’ understanding of a function given by a physical model. Teoksessa G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (toim.) The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy Vol. 25, MAA Notes. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America, 175–193.
Norman, A. 1992. Teachers’ mathematical knowledge of the concept of function. Teoksessa G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (toim.) The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy Vol. 25, MAA Notes. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America, 215–232.
O'Callaghan, B.R. 1998. Computer-intensive algebra and students' conceptual knowledge of functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29 (1), 21-40.
Sajka, M. 2003. A secondary school student’s understanding of the concept of function – A case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53, 229-254.
Sánchez, V. & Llinares, S. 2003. Four student teachers' pedagogigal reasoning on functions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6 (1), 5-25.
Sfard, A. 1992. Operational origins of mathematical objects and the quandary of reification: The case of function. Teoksessa G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (toim.) The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy Vol. 25, MAA Notes. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America, 59–84.
Siu, M.K. 1995. Concept of function—its history and teaching. Teoksessa F. Swetz, J. Fauvel, O. Bekken, B. Johansson & V. Katz (toim.) Learn From the Masters: Proceedings of Workshop on History of Mathematics at Kristiansand in August 1988. Washington D.C.: Mathematical Association of America, 105-121.
Slavit, D. 1997. An alternate route to the reification of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33 (3), 259-281.
Soybaş, D., Aksoy, Y. & Akay, H. 2008. Senior student teachers’ understanding of relations between function, equation, and polynomial concepts as conceptual knowledge. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3 (3), 203-225.
Tall, D. 1992. The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: Functions, limits, infinity and proof. Teoksessa D. A. Grouws (toim.), Handbook of Research on MathematicsTeaching and Learning. New York: Macmillan, 495–511.