02 SES 02 B, VET Systems in Local and Global Contexts
This survey investigated the extent to which a concept such as the German evaluation concept of peer review in TVET might be capable of transfer to other national and cultural context. This research question was embedded in the research field of comparative research into TVET and policy transfer (e.g. Steiner-Khamsi/Waldow 2012).
The study surveyed the factors both supporting and inhibiting transfer peer review in TVET into another national and cultural context using the example of China. The host country was selected according to the most-different-approach (Georg 2005), e.g. Germany and China vary in their culture, in the political system and in the TVET structure (e.g. Busemeyer/Trampusch2012). The study was designed to provide a ‘lessons learned’ approach to transfer peer review in TVET to other national and cultural context. The research design used the lesson-drawing approach (Rose 1991).
Peer review in TVET is one model for evaluating quality assurance in TVET schools and works participatively and democratically within a flat organisational hierarchy between the peer team and the TVET school teachers (Gutknecht-Gmeiner 2007). The Chinese evaluation concept follows the opposite approach: for example, the Chinese evaluation concept does not take account of the interests and needs of teachers (Yao 2008). It has a high hierarchical structure. If peer review in TVET could be transferred to Chinese TVET schools, this might overcome recent challenges faced by the Chinese evaluation concept.
The transfer of peer review to Chinese TVET schools requires an open approach, using a flexible pilot. The iterative micro-cycle of the design-based research approach enables policies to be adapted while the pilot study is still under way (Reinking/Bradley 2008). The study therefore used the iterative micro-cycle to implement transfer of the peer review concept.
This study used the environmental system model as a framework for interpretation (O’Connor 1988) and divided the interpretation framework into a macro level, an exo level, and a meso level. At the macro level, interpretation was based on the Chinese cultural model using findings from international management studies research and Chinese cultural studies. At the exo level, China’s national TVET system was used as the reference. At the meso level, the existing quality evaluation structure within Chinese TVET schools was used.
Buseymeyer, M. R.& Trampusch, C. (Eds.) (2012). The Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Georg, W. (2005). Vergleichende Berufsbildungsforschung. In: F. Rauner (Ed.), Handbuch der Berufsbildungsforschung (pp. 186-193). Bielefeld: Bertelsmann. Gutknecht-Gmeiner, M. (2007). European Peer Review Manual for initial VET. Vienna: öibf. O’Connor, G. (1988). Case management: System and practice. Social Casework, 69(2), 97-106. Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education, 39(4), 451-461. Reinking, D., & Bradley, B.A. (2008). Formative and design experiments. Amsterdam, New York: Teachers College Press. Rose, R. (1991). What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 3-30. G. Steiner-Khamsi, & F. Waldow (Eds.) (2012), World yearbook of education 2012. Policy borrowing and lending in education (S. 3-17). New York: Routledge. Taylor, S.; Bogdan, R. & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource. New Jersey: Willey. Yao, A. (2008). 沿革与反思: 我国高等职业教育质量保障制度建设二十年 [20 years quality management in TVET China]. 教育与职业 [Education and Vocation], 23(8), 12-13.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.