ERG SES C 14, Science and Maths Education
School experience is an important component of teacher education programs since experiences pre-service teachers (PTs) get during school placements influence their professional development (Richardson, 1996; Zeichner, 2002). Also, school experience course contribute construction of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). During school experience course, experienced teachers are assigned as mentors who are supposed to be a good model for PTs in terms of how to teach science effectively. As mentioned in the literature, subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge are viewed as crucial knowledge domains of teachers’ professional knowledge to teach effectively (Abell, 2007). PCK is thought to be a special body of knowledge, a blend of content knowledge and pedagogy that teachers should have for effective teaching (Shulman, 1987). In the related literature, researches on PCK generally focuses on investigating the nature of pre-service and in-service teachers’ PCK (Park & Oliver, 2008), and how to develop their PCK (De Jong, van Driel & Verloop, 2005). However, there have been few study on examining teachers’ PCK from students’ perspective (Halim, Abdullah & Meerah, 2014; Jang, 2011; Tuan, Chang, Wang & Treagust, 2000). Although all of these studies conducted survey questionnaire to collect data, they differentiate in terms of grade level of participants of the study. While Tuan et al., 2000 and Halim et al., 2014 studied with high school students, Jang (2011) examined college students’ opinions on their teachers PCK. On the other hand, the common point of these studies is that teachers’ PCK is highly related to students’ learning. Therefore, it would be better to examine how mentor teachers implement the components of PCK and how PCTs evaluate their mentors’ PCK using teacher observation form. The current study draws on the studies mentioned above but differentiate in term of adopting a qualitative research approach and grade of participants.
In the current study, Magnusson, Krajik and Borko (1999)’s PCK model was used to prepare teacher observation form and shaped the group discussions and by this way PCTs observe their mentors’ teaching practice and reflect their own ideas about mentors’ PCK. Magnusson et al. (1999)’s PCK model is composed of five components: science teaching orientation, knowledge of curricula, knowledge of learner, knowledge of instructional strategies, and knowledge of assessment. In this study, except science teaching orientation components, all components were used.
As known, PCK development is an ongoing process and the first step for PCK development is pre-service teacher education level. During teacher education programs, PTs are prepared for their entire careers as a teacher and they gain foundational knowledge and skills that will facilitate development of their PCK during teaching profession (Korthagen, Loughran & Russell, 2006). The prevailing factors contributing teachers’ PCK development is teaching experience and reflection (Nilsson, 2008). Although teaching experience is accepted as main source for PCK development, PTs lack of this experience. Therefore reflection gain priority in terms source of PCK development in teacher education programs (Van Driel, De Jong & Verloop, 2002). Therefore reflection play important role for PTs to analyze the teaching practices and develop their knowledge about teaching. The first aim of this study is to investigate pre-service chemistry teachers’ (PCTs) perceptions of observing their mentors’ PCK using teacher observation form. The second aim of this study is to investigate PCTs’ evaluations related to using the teacher observation form and discussing the observations about mentors’ PCK.
These research questions guided study were;
- How do pre-service chemistry teachers evaluate the use of teachers observation form in terms of contributing their knowledge about teaching?
- How do pre-service chemistry teachers evaluate observing mentor teachers’ PCK and discussion on these observations regarding contribution to their knowledge on teaching?
Abell, S.K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum De Jong, O., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42 (8), 947-964. Halim, L., Abdullah, S. I. S. S., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2014). Students’ perceptions of their science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Educational Technology. 23, 227-237. Jang, S.J. (2010). Assessing college students’ perceptions of a case teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge using a newly developed instrument. Journal of High Education. 61(6), 663–678. Korthagen, F., Loughran, J.J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices, Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1020-1041. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281–1299. Park, S. & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education. 38, 261–284. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.) Handbook of research on teacher education. New York: Simon & Schuster. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and training: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review. 57(1), 1-22. Tuan, H.L., Chang, H.P., Wang, K.H., & Treagust D.F. (2000). The development of an instrument for assessing students’ perceptions of teachers’ knowledge. International Journal of Science Education. 22 (4), 385–398. Van Driel, J.H., De Jong, O., &Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ PCK. Science Education, 86, 572–590. Zeichner, K. (1996) Designing educative practicum experiences for prospective teachers. In K. Zeichner, S. Melnick & M. L. Gomez (Eds) Currents of reform in preservice teacher education. (pp. 215-234). New York: Teachers College Press.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.