12 SES 08, Paper Session
Information Literacy importance in modern world has been increasing in most developed countries, specially in USA, UK and Australia. Searches for “information literacy” on bibliographic databases and on Internet each year show more and more entries in research, academic intervention projects and even at work. We have some conferences at european level with information literacy axes, like ECER and since 2013 we have European Conference of Information Literacy, a conference entirely dedicated to information literacy. In Portugal we have a few studies about information literacy, conducted mainly by librarians and almost all related to students at colleges and universities. Information Literacy research shows that freshman students at colleges and universities have big difficulties to deal with information (PIL, 2012). Students learn better information literacy when it is integrated in a curriculum. In order to improve students information literacy we need to teach them through all grades. Students at Middle Schools have already developed their basic skills on reading and writing, so it is a good moment to introduce information literacy instruction, if it hasn’t happened before.
Information Literacy is a prerequisite to participate effectively in information society and it is part of the basic human right of Lifelong Learning (US National Commission on Library and Information Science, 2003). Prague Declaration (NCLIS/NFIL/UNESCO, 2003) recommends the development of strongly interdisciplinary programs to promote information literacy at each country and considers that information literacy has an essential role to reduce inequalities and to promote tolerance and mutual agreement.
Information Literacy is a key element to lifelong learning in our knowledge society (Gaunt, Morgan, Somers, Soper, & Swain, 2009, p.80), and it is important in all subjects and grades and it is better developed in curriculum context (p.81).
Incorporation of information literacy into the curriculum makes easy teaching methods focused on students, including problem based learning, learning based on investigation or based on learning evidences with opportunities to auto-direct learning and reflection (ACRL, 2000). Gaunt, Morgan, Somers, Soper and Swain (2009) said that are evidences that suggest that incorporation of information literacy into the curriculum depends on collaborative work partnerships among all teaching and learning process stakeholders.
What do students know about information literacy? What is the relationship between information literacy and scholar achievement? What do teachers know about information literacy? How can we start an information literacy instruction program engaging teachers and students? Is Guided Inquiry a good way to learn information literacy integrated in curriculum?
To answer those questions we started an information literacy research project at one Portuguese middle school. In a first study in 2011 we assessed students information literacy knowledge. In a second study in 2012 we made a first try to teach information literacy to students. They did some activities such as to prepare an essay and a computer and oral presentation at Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) based on information searched on Internet. Those activities was made in collaboration with subjects and teachers of nature sciences and history. This time we assessed students information literacy before and after information literacy activities.
We will develop an instruction program of information literacy (ILIP). We will align Standards for the 21st-Century Learner (AASL, 2007) with the Portuguese curriculum. We will use Information Seek Process (Kuhlthau, 1991) and Guided Inquiry (Kuhlthau, Maniotes, Caspari, 2007; 2012) as a main theoretical support to ILIP. We cannot use Informatio Literacy European standards only because doesn't exist yet.
American Association of School Librarians (AASL). 2007. Standards for the 21st-century learner. Chicago: ALA. http://www.ala.org/aasl/files/guidelinesandstandards/learningstandards/AASL_Learning_Standards_2007.pdf (accessed Jan. 26, 2014). Field, A.P., & Gillet, R. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 63 (3), 665-694. Kuhlthau, C.C., Maniotes, L.K., & Caspari, A.K. (2007). Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century. Wetsport, CT: Libraries Unlimited. Kuhlthau, C.C., Maniotes, L.K., & Caspari, A.K. (2012). Guided Inquiry Design: a framework for inquiry in your school. Wetsport, CT: Libraries Unlimited. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective. Journal Of The American Society For Information Science, 42(5), 361-71. Lomba, S.E. (2013). Literacia Informacional numa escola do ensino básico. Non published MA Thesis. Education Institute, Lisbon University, Portugal. Lopes, C. & Pinto, M. (2010). IL-HUMASS – Instrumento de Avaliação de Competências em Literacia da Informação: um Estudo de Adaptação à População Portuguesa (parte 1). 10º Congresso da BAD - Bibliotecários, Arquivistas e Documentalistas, Guimarães. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/200 (acesses Jan 31, 2014). Todd, R., Kuhlthau, C. & Heinström, J., (2005). School Library Impact Measure (SLIM). A Toolkit and Handbook For Tracking and Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Of Guided Inquiry Through The School Library. http://cissl.rutgers.edu/SLIM_toolkit%20Handbook.pdf (accessed Jan. 26, 2014). Tool for Real-Time Assessment of Information Literacy Skills. Ninth grade General Assessment1. http://www.trails-9.org (accessed Jan. 26, 2014). Gaunt, J., Morgan, N., Somers, R., Soper, R. & Swain, E. (2009).Handbook for Information Literacy Teaching. University Library Service (3rd rev.)(2011 updated). Retirado em 7 de Outubro de 2012 de http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/insrv/educationandtraining/infolit/hilt/HILT%202011%20-%20FINAL.pdf NCLIS/NFIL/UNESCO (2003). The Prague Declaration: Towards An Information Literate Society. Retirado em 17 junho de 2013 de http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/PragueDeclaration.pdf
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.