Prospective Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Interpretations of Graphs related to Integral
Author(s):
Esra Demiray (presenting / submitting) Elif Saygı
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES C 07, Mathematics and Education

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-21
11:00-12:30
Room:
W3.15
Chair:
Pauline Taylor

Contribution

Calculus is accepted as one of the main courses in mathematics and a basis for learning concepts in more advanced mathematics (Mahir, 2009; Sevimli, 2013). The importance of concepts covered in calculus can also be seen through the applications of these concepts in different disciplines such as science, engineering and economics (Firouzian, 2014; Nasari, 2008). According to the literature review, studies regarding various concepts of calculus have been conducted by researchers such as limit and continuity (e.g., Aydos, 2015; Bezuidenhout, 2001), derivative (e.g., Kula, 2013; Orton, 1983), definite integral (e.g, Oberg, 2000; Rasslan & Tall, 2002), and indefinite integral (e.g., Metaxas, 2007; Swidan & Yerushalmy, 2014). This study aims to contribute to the literature by investigating integral.

Integral is not only a central concept of calculus in university level (Mahir, 2009; Rasslan & Tall, 2002; Rosasco, 2013), but also a fundamental component of high school mathematics curriculum in Turkey (Yazlık & Erdoğan, 2015). In other words, according to the objectives of the 12th grade mathematics curriculum in Turkey stated by the Ministry of National Education (MoNE, 2013), some concepts of calculus such as limit, derivative and integral are introduced to students at high school level. The studies undertaken regarding integral showed that students at every level have difficulties in integral (Oberg, 2000; Rasslan & Tall, 2002; Yazlık & Erdoğan, 2015). To develop both high school and undergraduate students’ understanding of integral and to address the difficulties they have, students’ level of conceptual and procedural knowledge and the deficiencies they have related to integral should be determined as an important step (Mahir, 2009). Then, teacher educators might also improve their further teaching experiences based on this step.

According to Ross (1996, as cited in Goerdt, 2007), to foster students’ conceptual understanding, they are expected to interpret and use numerical, graphical, symbolic and verbal representations in concepts of calculus accurately. Similarly, to be able to move between various representations in concepts of calculus is among the objectives of calculus course (Goerdt, 2007). Moreover, undergraduate students have some difficulties in graphical interpretations of integral and area relations (Grundmeier, Hansen, & Sousa, 2006; Sağlam, 2011) and they have tendency to use algebraic methods instead of geometrical or graphical methods in calculation of integral (Oberg, 2000). Since calculus is a basis for the following mathematics courses in mathematics teacher education program (Nasari, 2008), prospective middle school mathematics teachers should have necessary content knowledge about each concept of the calculus and apply them properly (Mahir, 2009). In this respect, the purpose of the study is to investigate prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ interpretations of graphs related to integral in terms of year level. Based on this purpose, research questions were stated as follows:

1. To what extent can prospective middle school mathematics teachers interpret graphs related to integral?

2. Does year of enrollment in teacher education program affect their interpretations?

Method

To answer the mentioned research questions, a cross-sectional survey research will be used. In a cross-sectional survey, the data is collected from a sample at just one point in time to describe some aspects of the population through asking questions (Fraenkel & Wallen, 2005). In this study, to investigate prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ interpretations of graphs related to integral, questions regarding definite and indefinite integrals were prepared by reviewing the literature (Orton, 1983; Rasslan & Tall, 2002; Stewart, 2001; Thomas, Weir, Hass, & Giordano, 2010). These questions were evaluated by five experts in mathematics and three experts in mathematics education. According to the feedbacks of the experts, questions were revised and three questions were determined in order to use in this study. Question 1 is related to graphs in indefinite integral while Questions 2 and 3 are related to graphs in definite integral. The pilot study was conducted with eight prospective middle school mathematics teachers who were two students selected randomly form each year level. Since prospective middle school mathematics teachers have different mathematics courses in each year level, all four year levels in the teacher education program (freshmen, sophomores, juniors and seniors) will be included as the participants in the study. For example, in the selected university, Discrete Mathematics is offered in the first year of teacher education program while Calculus I and II are offered in the second year of the program. In the present study, prospective middle school mathematics teachers enrolled in Elementary Mathematics Teacher Education program of a state university in Ankara were selected as the participants by using convenience sampling. Data will be collected in the spring semester of 2016-2017 academic year. In data analysis, descriptive statistics will be used.

Expected Outcomes

As mentioned, Question 1 is related to indefinite integral. The definition of indefinite integral stressed that every function in the set differs from the others through an arbitrary constant which is generally expressed with the letter c (Swidan & Yerushalmy, 2014). However, according to the studies involving indefinite integral, students generally have difficulties in understanding the constant c (Oberg, 2000; Sağlam, 2011). Considering this issue, participants in this study who do not understand the meaning of the constant c might have difficulties in graphical representation of indefinite integral. Literature review also showed that students have difficulties in symbolic representation of integral (Grundmeier, Hansen, & Sousa, 2006; Oberg, 2000). Since Question 2 involves writing the shaded area in graph symbolically, some students who are not familiar with formal language and notations in calculus might not answer this question correctly. On the other hand, studies presented that students generally understand integral-area relation and conduct routine procedures to calculate the area under a curve (Mahir, 2009). Since Question 3 includes graph of a function and asks the calculation of a definite integral based on this graph, the percentage of correct answers in Question 3 is expected to be higher compared to other questions. Since Calculus I is offered in the second year of teacher education program of the selected university, sophomore prospective teachers are expected to be more successful in interpreting graphs. Although freshman prospective teachers studied about integral in the high school mathematics course, they might have procedural understanding about integral and not be able to interpret graphs. In this manner, they were expected to be the least successful year level compared to others. To investigate reasons behind prospective mathematics teachers’ misinterpretations of graphs related to integral in detail, follow-up interviews might be conducted in further studies.

References

Firouzian, S. S. (2014). Correlations between students’ multiple ways of thinking about the derivative and their abilities to solve applied derivative problems. (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Maine. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2005). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill. Goerdt, L. S. (2007). The effect of emphasizing multiple representations on calculus students’ understanding of the derivative concept. (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Minnesota. Grundmeier, T. A., Hansen, J. & Sousa, E. (2006). An exploration of definition and procedural fluency in integral calculus. Problem, Resources and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 16(2), 178–191. Mahir, N. (2009). Conceptual and procedural performance of undergraduate students integration. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 201-211. Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2013). Ortaöğretim Matematik Dersi 9–12 Sınıflar Öğretim Programı. Retrieved in May 16 from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretim-programlari/icerik/72. Nasari, Y. G. (2008). The effect of graphıng calculator embedded materıals on college students’ conceptual understandıng and achıevement ın a calculus I course. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3296875). Oberg, R. (2000). An investigation of under graudate calculus students understanding of the definite integral. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 9993971). Orton, A. (1983). Student’s understanding of Integration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14(1), 1-18. Rasslan, S., & Tall, D. (2002). Definitions and images for the definite integral concept. Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 89-96, Norwich: England. Rosasco, M. E. (2013). Factors associated with success in college calculus II. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3572564). Sağlam, Y. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinin integral konusunda görsel ve analitik stratejileri. (Doctoral dissertation), Hacettepe University. Sevimli, E. (2013). Bilgisayar cebiri sistemi destekli öğretimin farklı düşünme yapısındaki öğrencilerin integral konusundaki temsil dönüşüm süreçlerine etkisi. (Doctoral dissertation), Marmara University. Stewart, J. (2001). Calculus:Concepts and Contexts. (2nd edition). Brooks/Cole, Thomson Learning. Swidan, O., & Yerushalmy, M. (2014). Learning the indefinite integral in a dynamic and interactive technological environment. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(4), 517–531. Thomas, G. B., Weir, M. D., Hass, J., & Giordano, F. R. (2010). Thomas’ Calculus. (12th edition). Boston: Pearson Education. Yazlık, D.Ö., Erdoğan, A. (2015). İntegralde alan uygulamaları konusunda Flash programı ile geliştirilen öğretim materyalinin değerlendirilmesi. Hacı Bektaş Veli University Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 144-159.

Author Information

Esra Demiray (presenting / submitting)
Hacettepe University
Ankara
Hacettepe University, Turkey

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.