Self-regulated learning (SRL) is increasingly emphasized in educational policy due to its importance in and outside the classroom (Dumont, Istance, & Benavides, 2010). Self-regulated learners refers to autonomous, reflective and efficient learners with (meta)cognitive abilities as well as motivational beliefs and attitudes to understand, monitor and direct their own learning (Wolters, 2003, p.189). Several studies show the positive impact on academic success when being actively engaged in the own learning process (e.g., Boekaerts, 1999; Zuffianò et al., 2013).

From a sociocultural perspective, the development of self-regulated learning takes place in a social environment where meaningful interactions occur with more experienced partners (Bandura, 1997). Besides teachers and students’ peers, parents play a central role in children’s live (Cheung & Pomerantz, 2012). Several studies (e.g., Cheung & Pomerantz, 2012; Hill & Tyson, 2009; Pino-Pasternak & Whitebread, 2010) have revealed that parental involvement in learning (e.g., discussing children’s schoolwork and attending parent–teacher conferences) facilitates children’s learning and ultimately their achievement. Also, some authors stress parents’ positive influence in the development of children’s SRL (Pino-Pasternak & Whitebread (2010); Zimmerman (2002); Zuffianò et al., 2013). They claim that self-regulatory beliefs and processes can be learned from instruction and modelling by children’s own parents. Pino-Pasternak and Whitebread’s theoretical model (2010) is based on a systematic review exploring the relationships between parent behaviours and elementary school children’s SRL. This model identifies three parenting dimensions (challenge, autonomy and contingency) and six parenting behaviours (metacognitive talk, active participation, understanding of control, shifts in responsibility, emotional responsiveness and contingent instructional scaffolds), which are differentially related to SRL. These parenting dimensions and behaviours are in line with effective factors and practices in fostering students’ SRL: (1) explicit instruction, (2) gradual transitions from external regulation (by a tutor) to self-regulation (by the student) through scaffolded interactions; (3) encouraging metacognitive talk, (4) and an emotionally supportive environment (Perry, 1998).

Despite the positive effects of parental involvement on students’ SRL, only limited research has been conducted so far (Pino-Pasternak & Whitebread, 2010). Especially when considering parental involvement during secondary education (Hill & Tyson, 2009) which is possibly related to the reducing time and type of home-based involvement (Seginer, 2006). The study’s main aim therefore is to explore the relationship between parental involvement in the first years of secondary education and students’ self-regulated learning in combination with their study results.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. Barge, J. K., & Loges, W. E. (2003). Parent, student, and teacher perceptions of parental involvement. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31(2), 140–163. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457. Cheung, C. S.-S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2012). Why does parents’ involvement enhance children's achievement? The role of parent-oriented motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 820–832. Dumont, H., Istance, D., & Benavides, F. (Eds.) (2010). The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice. Paris: OECD Publishing. Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: a meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–63. Jeynes, W. (2010). The salience of the subtle aspects of parental involvement and encouraging that involvement: Implications for school-based programs. The Teachers College Record, 112(3), 747–774. Muller, C. (1995), Maternal employment, parental 
involvement, and mathematics achievement among adolescents, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 85–100. Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 715–729. Pino-Pasternak, D., & Whitebread, D. (2010). The role of parenting in children’s self-regulated learning. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 220–242. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self- regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40
. Seginer, R. (2006). Parents’ educational involvement: A developmental ecology perceptive. Parenting: Science and Practice, 6, 1–48. Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W. (2009). Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 671–688. Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an under-emphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189–205. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. Zuffianò, A., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Di Giunta, L., Milioni, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2013). Academic achievement: The unique contribution of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning beyond intelligence, personality traits, and self-esteem. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 158–162.