Session Information
26 SES 06 B, Principals' Role to Support and Assess Teachers
Paper Session
Contribution
In today’s schools, the teachers’ work and professional knowledge are increasingly challenged and questioned, and politicians tend to seek quick solutions to the schools’ so-called crisis. One such solution was the implementation of a career position reform for advanced teachers in 2013.
The 2013 career position reform for advanced teachers (SKOLF 2013: 147) allows schools to apply for state funding to establish careers for teachers in primary and secondary schools. Fully developed, the reform will include 17,000 teachers in 2016/2017. The reform includes a small number of lecturers (with a doctorate degree), but the project in which this study is carried out is restricted to research on the career positions of advanced teachers.
The reform was introduced to offer support to individual teachers and their careers as well as contribute to school development. To what extent this is achievable depends on many different factors; including the conditions created for and by the teachers selected for this position, which, among others things, is dependent on how the reform is interpreted by various actors.
Research on School Effectiveness (see for instance Sammons, Hillman, & Mortimore, 1997) has contributed to knowledge of the characteristics of effective schools, namely schools that, in comparison to other schools, achieve good results. The starting point of the research is that something can be learned from schools that have proven to be successful. When effectiveness research starting points are transferred to local school practices, it seems essential to first identify effective teachers, teachers who, compared to others, achieve particularly good results with their students. And secondly, to work to ensure that their knowledge and teaching methods will be spread throughout the school. One way to interpret the reform is by equating the advanced teacher with the effective teacher, who has access to and can transfer knowledge to their colleagues on how to achieve good results.
On the other hand, more process- and learning-oriented research about the development of schools has contributed to knowledge relevant for teachers learning in Professional Learning Communities (DuFour, 2004; Louise, 2006; Stoll & Louise, 2007; Wald & Castleberry, 2000), for teachers’ engagement in knowledge building processes based on every day practices as grounds for development (Thelin & Scherp, 2014) and for schools’ development into Learning Organizations (Leitwood & Louise, 1998). Within such theoretical frameworks, school development takes the shape of a problem-solving process (Hameyer, 2001, Scherp, 2003). The perspective of school development as an open ended sense making process opens up for other interpretations of the role and work of the advanced teacher; than those based on the efficiency perspective. Instead of being considered a consumer of knowledge, the teacher is regarded as a producer or co-creator of learning and teaching knowledge.
The aim of the study presented in this paper is to explore the ways in which the role of an advanced teacher is seen in relation to school development within Swedish educational context, by teachers selected for the position.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
DuFour, R. (2004). Schools as Learning Communities. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11. Hameyer, U. (u.å). Schools as learning organizations: Practices that work. Downloaded 2008-12-09 from http://www.hameyer.unikiel.de/texts/learning_teacher_2007_gesamttext_uwe_03.pdf. Leithwood, K. & Louis, K. S. (1998). Organizational learning in schools. Downing, PA: Swets & Zeithlinger. Louis, K. S. (2008). Creating and sustaining professional community from the top-down: A reflective study. I A. Blankstein, P. Houston & R. Coles (Red.), Sustaining learning communities (ss. 41-57). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Marton, F. & Tsui, A. M. B. (2004). (Eds.). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Sammons, P., Hillman, J. & Mortimore, P. (1997). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. I J. White & M. Barber (Red.), Perspectives on school effectiveness and school improvement (ss. 77-124). London: University of London, Institute of Education. Scherp, H.-Å. (u.å.). School Development – based on everyday problems. Downloaded 2015-02-01 from http://www.pbs.kau.se/In%20English/PBS_%20in_English_2.pdf Stoll, L. & Louis, K. S. (2007). Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press. Thelin, K. & Scherp, H-Å. (2014). Swedish Teachers And School Leaders As Researchers Within Their Own Practice. Paper presented at the ECER 2014, the 2014 conference of the European Educational Research Association, Rethymnon, September, 3. Wald, P. J. & Castleberry, M. S. (2000). Educators as learners: Creating a professional learning community in your school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.