Learning Democracy in Schools: Insights about Citizenship Education and Social Inclusion
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

25 SES 09, Children's Rights in Education

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-10
11:00-12:30
Room:
207.Oktatóterem [C]
Chair:
Didier Reynaert

Contribution

This communication is based on information gathered during the third and last year of R & D research project "Democracy, Participation and Inclusive Education in Schools" (EDU2012-39556-C02-02). The purpose of this paper is to present the initial results and conclusions related to the participation of secondary school students in democratic activities, identified during the past year and observed during the academic year 2014-15. The aim is to assess how young people experience the citizenship learning at school from an inclusive perspective.

This communication is based on information gathered during the third and last year of R & D research project "Democracy, Participation and Inclusive Education in Schools" (EDU2012-39556-C02-02). The purpose of this paper is to present the initial results and conclusions related to the participation of secondary school students in democratic activities, identified during the past year and observed during the academic year 2014-15. The aim is to assess how young people experience the citizenship learning at school from an inclusive perspective.

 

The starting point of this paper is the concept of "citizenship as a practice" (Biesta and Lawy, 2006) linked to the quotidian dynamics of democratic experiences that young people experience either inside or outside the centre, and differentiated from citizenship as a result of the academic trajectory. From this perspective, participation is essential for a democratic learning experience. On the one hand, we consider that democratic citizenship education must relate to inclusion (Grossman, 2008; Osler; Starkey, 2004). In fact, as stated Edelstein (2011: 128) “the only institution that can provide opportunities to cultivate democratic experience –not for elite groups, but for all children and youth is the school”. For this reason we assert that a democratic education can promote social cohesion and it is the main topic of our research.

 

On the other hand, we consider social inclusion from an ethical perspective based on equity (Allan, 2003). The current social division has demonstrated the social fracture showing the disparities between different members of ociety; despite the current discourse moving towards a more inclusive society. From a fairer, equitable and more inclusive society we think that it is necessary a more critical vision of the citizenship learning.

 


Inclusion cannot neither disassociate from the right to education, to express their views, to be free to express their thoughts and opinions expressed in the Convention in the Rights on the Child in 1989 (UNICEF, 2014). Inclusion promotes an increase in the participation of students while reducing the exclusion of common curriculum, culture and community (Booth and Ainscow, 1998). Finally, referring to inclusion means educational and social democratic practices (Blyth y Milne, 1996; Booth, 1996; Clough, 1999). Inclusion is "to participate in the community of all ensuring and respecting the right not only to be or even belong but to participate actively, politically and civically in the society and in the school life" (Parrilla, 2002: 19). Therefore, in order to provide appropriate opportunities for students, participation in decision-making processes in the school is one of the key tasks of a centre that ensures its democratic health (Simovska, 2004; McLellan et al. 1999; Samdal et al., 1998).

From this perspective, learning democracy in school is not only a school responsibility focused on educational activities that have taken place in the centre, but also the relationship with the community. A commitment to integrate democracy is needed in classrooms and schools to ensure the inclusion.

 

Method

The data we used in this paper come from the participant observations of different democratic experiences about the field work carried out during this year. These observations were chosen in relation to schools and their students. We have chosen the two centres of our research that are more involved in a democratic way of living at school (Dewey, 1916; Apple and Beane) . We have observed the most relevant democratic practices and we have focused on four young immigrant girls (two of each centre selected) in order to analyze their participation in the activities that the school proposals, in relation to the curriculum, the relationship with schoolmates, teachers and the community. We have focused on participant observation to analyze different dimensions that have influence on the centres democratic culture such as: 1) the development of educational activities that promote the creation of new spaces of horizontal relationship between young people and teachers in reduced and heterogeneous working groups; 2) the real possibility of young people to have a say and make their voices heard, 3) the optimal conditions so that young people can make decisions related to the curriculum, the standards of practice and the school organization. In addition, connected to the four young ethnographic observations we have analyzed: 1) their own participation in activities that we observed; 2) their own contributions and interactions with the group and 3) the democratic participation processes in which they are immersed. The analysis of these dimensions through the observations offers elements to understand their participation conditions. At the same time, we analyse whether fostering an inclusive environment for an active participation promotes active citizenship learning as a process towards democracy.

Expected Outcomes

Two main results will be explored in this paper. The first is linked to the centres.This research focuses on the understanding of how the environment of the school offers different kinds of opportunities to be involved to young pupils, to have a say and to make decisions in relation to educational activities for citizenship learning. The second result is linked to citizenship learning. Young lives are constructed from a complex net of democratic and non-democratic practices inside and outside the school (Murphy, 2004). So it is relevant to identify if the participation experiences that young people live in school become transitional spaces useful to understand citizenship learning as a process not only as a result. Consequently, some key elements of this citizenship learning can be identified in daily school practices: Citizenship-as-practice which not only encompasses problems and issues of culture and identity but draws these different dynamic aspects together in a continuously shifting and changing world of difference. Such a view of citizenship, as we will argue, provides a more robust entry point for understanding and supporting young people’s citizenship learning in this area” (Biesta and Lawy, 2006: 37). Understanding citizenship as a practice approaches us to the daily lives of young people and their subjectivity, which helps us to consider citizenship learning from an inclusive perspective.

References

Allan, J. (2003) (ed.). Inclusion, Participation, and Democracy: What Is the Purpose? Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Apple, M. W.; Beane, J. A. (Comps) (1997). Democratic Schools. Virginia: ASCD. Barton, L. (1997). Inclusive education: romantic subversive or realistic?. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1: 3, 231-242. Biesta G.; Lawy, R. (2006). Citizenship-as-practice: the educational implications of an inclusive and relational understanding of citizenship. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54:1, 34-50. Blyth, E.; Milner, J. (2002) Exclusions: trends and issues, in Blyth, E.; Milne, J.(eds.). Exclusions from school. London: Routledge, 3- 20. Booth T. (2002). Stories of exclusion. Natural and unnatural selection», in Blyth, E.; Milne, J. (eds.). Exclusions from school. London: Routledge. 21-36. Booth T.; Ainscow, M. (1998). From them to us. London: Routledge. Clough, P. (1999). Exclusive tendencies: concepts, consciousness and curriculum in the project of inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3:1, 63-73. UNICEF (2014). Convention on the Rights of the Child, http: "http://www.unicef.org/crc/index_30160.html" http://www.unicef.org/crc/index_30160.html Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: MacMillan Edelstein, W. (2011) Education for Democracy: reasons and strategies. European Journal of Education, 46:1, 127-137. Grossman, D.L. (2008). Democracy, citizenship education and inclusion: a multidi-mensional approach. Prospects, 38: 35-46, UNESCO IBE. McLellan, L., Rissel, C., Donnelly, N. and Bauman, A. (1999). “Health behaviour and the school environment in New South Wales, Australia”, Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 49, pp. 611-9. Murphy, T.A. (2004). Deliberative civic education and civil society: a consideration of ideals and actualities in democracy and communication education, Communication Education, 53:1, 74–91. Osler, A.; Starkey, H. (2004). Changing citizenship: Democracy and Inclusion in Education. Leicester: University of Leicester. Parrilla, A. (2002). Acerca del origen y sentido de la educación inclusiva. Revista de Educación, 327, 11-29. Samdal, O., Nutbeam, D., Wold, B. and Kannas, L. (1998). “Achieving health and educational goals through school – a study of the importance of school climate and student satisfaction”, Health Education Research, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 383-97. Simovska, V. (2004). “Student participation: a democratic education perspective – experience from the health-promoting schools in Macedonia”, Health Education Research, Vol. 19, pp. 198-207.

Author Information

Núria Simó (presenting / submitting)
University of Vic
Education
Vic
Alba Parareda (presenting)
University of Vic, Spain
University of Vic, Spain
University of Vic
Pedagogy
Vic
University of Vic, Spain
University of Vic, Spain

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.