Digital Media Literacy of 5th and 6th Grade Priamry Students
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES D 01, Media and Education

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-07
13:30-15:00
Room:
397. [Main]
Chair:
Petra Grell

Contribution

As information and communication technology (ICT) spreads rapidly around the world, digital media and digital technology have influenced the way of our life. New media technologies have changed the way that knowledge is produced and shared, with the Internet and computers becoming the dominant tools for learning (Gialamas, Nikolopoulou, & Koutromanos, 2013).  

Over the past decades, researchers and scholars have attempted to define digital media literacy from different perspectives. Digital media literacy is considered with not only the simple technical ICT skills, but also various cognitive and problem solving abilities (Aesaert et al., 2014; Luu & Freeman, 2011). In this study, digital media literacy is considered as a set of competence or skills from an operational perspective. The conceptual framework of digital media literacy was developed by integrating the above mentioned dimensions, which include four key components: 1) technical knowledge and skills, 2) critical understanding, 3) creation and communication, 4) citizenship participation. (David Buckingham, 2009; Chirst, 2004; European Association for Viewers Interests, 2010).

In order to implement digital media literacy education effectively, understanding student’s digital media literacy is considered as a prerequisite to digital media literacy education (Arke & Primack, 2009; Hobbs & Frost, 2003). It can provide educators information about what students already know, which make education more effective. Moreover, it is necessary to identify factors related to student’s digital media literacy (Claro et al., 2012; Kim, Kil, & Shin, 2014). However, the measurement of digital media literacy remains the critical challenge and insufficient (Arke & Primack, 2009; European Association for Viewers Interests, 2010).   Therefore, this study not only aims to develop an instrument to examine primary student’s digital media literacy, but also to examine school level and family level factors associated to primary students’ digital media literacy. For this purpose, this study addresses the following research questions: RQ1: Can we validate the instrument for measuring primary students’ digital media literacy? What’s the validity and reliability of the measurement instrument? RQ2:  What are the levels of digital media literacy (regarding technical knowledge and skills, critical understanding, creation and communication, citizenship participation) of 5th -6th grade primary students? RQ3: To what extent are student level factors (gender, age, basic use of digital technologies) and family level factors (parents’ education background, parental mediation) related to primary students’ digital media literacy?

Based on previous studies, we built an integrated model of the impact of external and internal variables on digital media literacy. Technical knowledge and skills, critical understanding, creation and communication, and citizenship participation are essential parts of measurement of digital media literacy. It is also important to take internal and external factors into account, such as gender, age, students’ use of digital technology, parents’ education background and parental mediation. It integrates gender, age, students’ use of digital technology, parental mediation and digital media literacy into one research model. This conceptual model is also the base for guiding the research questions of the present study.

Method

This research is based on a quantitative study. A questionnaire was designed to measure the digital media literacy of primary student and the related factors put forth in this study. All participants were invited to participate in this study through paper questionnaire. Participants In total, 796 students from 5 primary schools in Beijing took part in this study (Table 2). The students were 9 to 13 years old, 58.3% were from the 5th grade and 41.7% were from 6th grade. Among them, 52.1% (N=380) students were male and 47.9% (N=414) were female. Instruments On the basis of the conceptual framework for digital media literacy, a questionnaire was formulated. It includes 42 items, divided into 4 sections. Participants were invited to rate their agreement with each item on a 5-point Likert scale (except demographic information), ranging from 1-“Strongly disagree” to 5-“Strongly agree”. The first section aimed at gathering students’ demographic information, such as students’ gender, age, parents’ education background. The second section includes 8 items, focusing on students’ basic use of digital technology, such as usage of the Internet, computer and mobile device. The third section is designed to examine parental mediation of students’ usage and understanding of digital technology and media. An example question is “My parents talk with me about what we found on the Internet or television”. The fourth section is a digital media literacy scale, which includes 23 items, aiming at measuring digital media literacy of primary students. Data analysis First, in order to test the instrument validity, the data were divided into equal halves. One half of the data was used for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with varimax rotation. The other half of the data was used for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Second, the reliability of instrument was also examined. Furthermore, descriptive statistics was conducted to explore students’ performance in four sub-scales of digital media literacy. In addition, t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted to explore differences in digital media literacy with students’ background variables (gender, grade, age). To explore factors associated with primary students’ digital media literacy, regression analyses were conducted.

Expected Outcomes

Instrument for assessment of digital media literacy of primary students The findings of the present research provide the integrated model not only including the theoretical structure of digital media literacy, but also the factors related to digital media literacy. Additionally, the results reveal that the instrument has an adequate validity and reliability in assessing digital media literacy of primary students. Digital media literacy of primary students In the present study, there are no significant gender differences in digital media literacy. This finding challenges previous studies. Chang et al. (2011) found that female students were more competent than male students regarding media literacy on 5th and 6th grade in Taiwan primary schools. With regards to digital media literacy of different grades, 6th grade students reported higher than 5th grade in technical knowledge and skills and critical understanding. This finding challenges previous study which show that no difference regarding ICT skills between different ages in primary school (Hakkarainen et al., 2000). The effect of student and family variables on digital media literacy of primary students In the present study primary students’ digital media literacy, is found to be positive related to age, students’ basic use of digital technology and parental mediation. More specifically, technical knowledge and skills was found to be positive related to gender, age, students’ basic use of digital technology, and parental mediation. Moreover, creation and communication and citizenship participation could be affected by students’ basic use of digital technology and parental mediation.

References

Aesaert, K., van Braak, J., van Nijlen, D., & Vanderlinde, R. (2015). Primary school pupils’ ICT competences: Extensive model and scale development. Computers & Education, 81, 326–344. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.021 Arke, E. T., & Primack, B. a. (2009). Quantifying media literacy: development, reliability, and validity of a new measure. Educational Media International, 46(1), 53–65. doi:10.1080/09523980902780958 Buckingham, D. (2009). the future of media literacy in the digital age- some challenges for policy and practice. Chang, C., & Liu, E. Z. (2011). Exploring the media literacy of Taiwanese elementary school students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 604–611 Chirst, william G. (2004). assessment, media literacy standards, and higher education. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(92), 92–96. Claro, M., Preiss, D. D., San Martín, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., … Nussbaum, M. (2012). Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1042–1053. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.004 European Association for Viewers’ Interests. (2010). study on assessment criteria for media literacy levels.pdf. Gialamas, V., Nikolopoulou, K., & Koutromanos, G. (2013). Student teachers’ perceptions about the impact of internet usage on their learning and jobs. Computers & Education, 62, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.012 Hakkarainen, K., Iloma, L., Lipponen, L., Muukkonen, H., Rahikainen, M., Tuominen, T., … Lehtinen, E. (2000). Students ’ skills and practices of using ICT : results of a national assessment in Finland. Computer and Education, 34, 103–117 Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action. Washington, D.C.: The Aspen Institute. Kim, H.-S., Kil, H.-J., & Shin, A. (2014). An analysis of variables affecting the ICT literacy level of Korean elementary school students. Computers & Education, 77, 29–38. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.009 Luu, K., & Freeman, J. G. (2011). An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1072–1082. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.008

Author Information

Hui Zhang (presenting / submitting)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.