Session Information
28 SES 02, Standards, Knowledges and Assessment
Paper Session
Contribution
Standards are core aspects of the construction of European education policy space (Lawn & Grek, 2012; Lawn, 2011). They concern in complex ways education practice and policy-making, and develop in extended regulatory and conventional regimes. The extension and the relevance of standardization, and of standards has been related to the dominance of neo-liberal discourse and policy-making all over the world, and to the emergence of a new governance in education characterized by the substitution of politics with subtle forms of governance relying on apparently neutral, abstract conventions, technical led instruments and tools and new circles of expertise, and knowledge-making. Moreover, the extension has been sometimes highly criticized for being overtly instrumental to economic discourse (Ball, 2009; Edwards, 1997) and for offering a simplistic and reductionist description of education practice, now assimilated to a mere technical endeavour (Biesta, 2007). Is standardization an unavoidable aspect of everyday life, and of the field of education ? To what extent standardization has effects of uniformity in education practice and policy ? How standards are enacted out in education practice and policy ? Are standards a neutral device ? Have standards and standardization always negative effects in educational practice and policy ? Is there a way to articulate a critique to standardization without assuming an a priori contrast between standards and education ?
To try do develop some replies to these questions this paper intends to explore a promising and non-deterministic route for investigating the complex interplays between the extension of European standards in education and the local regimes of practice. To offer this view, the paper will rely on a socio-material approach to educational standards (Fenwick, Edwards, & Sawchuck, 2011; Fenwick & Edwards, 2010; Fenwick & Landri, 2012) that problematises the conceptualization of standard as matter of fact capable of producing predictable effect, and proposes to consider standards as matter of concern mobilising, in that case, complex, and some in case competing sociologies of education.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Ball, S. J. (2009). Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: network governance and the “competition state.” Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 83–99. doi:10.1080/02680930802419474 Biesta, G. (2007). “Why What Works” Won’t Work: Evidence-Based Practice and the Democratic Deficit in Educational Research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x Edwards, R. (1997). Changing Places? Flexibility, Lifelong Learning and a Learning Society. London: Routledge. Fenwick, T. (2010). (un)Doing standards in education with actor‐network theory. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 117–133. Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-Network Theory and Education. London: Routledge. Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuck, P. (2011). Emerging Approaches to Educational Research Tracing the Socio-Material (p. 220). London: Routledge. Fenwick, T., & Landri, P. (2012). Materialities, Textures and Pedagogies: Socio-Material Assemblages in Education. Intro. Pedagogy, Culture & Society. Hamilton, M. (2009). Putting words in their mouths: the alignment of identities with system goals through the use of Individual Learning Plans. British Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 221–242. doi:10.1080/01411920802042739 Landri, P. (2014). Governing by Standards: The Fabrication of Austerity in the Italian Educational System. Education Inquiry. Lawn, M. (2011). Standardizing the European Education Policy Space. European Educational Research Journal, 10(2), 259. doi:10.2304/eerj.2011.10.2.259 Lawn, M., & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing Education: governing a new policy space. London: Symposium Books. Mulcahy, D. (2011). Assembling the “Accomplished” Teacher: The performativity and the politics of professional teaching standards. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(S1), 94–113. Nespor, J. (2002). Networks and Contexts of Reform. Journal of Educational Change, 3(3-4), 365–382. doi:10.1023/A:1021281913741 Popkewitz, T. S. (2004). Educational Standards: Mapping Who We are and Are to Become. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(2), 243–256. Venturini, T. (2009). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258–273. doi:10.1177/0963662509102694
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.